I’m going to Europe in May and June of 2011, and I just finished making a budget for my trip that included the cost to get into every attraction that I want to see. However, I started thinking about some of the attractions that are going to be in the places I’m traveling to, and in particular, some of the churches and landmarks. I’ll start by saying where I’m going to be traveling to:
Madrid, Seville, Granada, Barcelona, Rome, Florence, Pisa, Venice, Berlin, Munich, Dublin, Cork, London, and Paris
There are so many churches and landmarks that charge you admission to climb to the top and things like that. However, I feel like, although it would be awesome to climb up to the top of a church or tower and see the whole city, that my money can be well spent by either enjoying the monuments from the outside, or paying the minimum amount (or in some cases where it’s free, not paying at all) to explore the main areas of the church/landmark and not pay the extra cost to "climb" things.
So here’s my predicament/question: Are there certain things in any of those cities that would REALLY be an awesome experience to climb and see? For example, everyone seems to say that that the Duomo in Florence is a must see and that I should climb up to see the Dome and the Bell Tower and all that fun stuff. And of course, I’d want to climb the Eiffel Tower. Are there some places where the experience would really be enhanced to pay the extra few euros to check out? Or are there some places where it would be better to just get my picture of, stand in awe looking at it outside for a few moments, and then be on my way to something else? I’ve never traveled outside of the United States before, so I’m just curious and interested in saving money if possible.
Thanks for the advice! Also, if you have anything in general about attractions in any of those places I listed, I’d appreciate that advice too?